<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SageRock Digital Marketing Blog &#187; SEM News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/category/sem-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog</link>
	<description>The SageRock Team Web Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 Most Viewed SageRock Blog Articles of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-10-most-viewed-sagerock-blog-articles-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-10-most-viewed-sagerock-blog-articles-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SageRock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=3497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it might be fun to see which articles people viewed the most this year on this blog. The interesting thing about doing this is that you often don&#8217;t anticipate which articles are going to be the big influencers. I&#8217;ve heard many bloggers say the same thing. &#8220;I pine for hours over an article [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-10-most-viewed-sagerock-blog-articles-of-2011/">The 10 Most Viewed SageRock Blog Articles of 2011</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it might be fun to see which articles people viewed the most this year on this blog.</p>
<p>The interesting thing about doing this is that you often don&#8217;t anticipate which articles are going to be the big influencers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard many bloggers say the same thing. &#8220;I pine for hours over an article and I get no response. And I throw something up in 20 minutes and people love it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The admissions director of my kid&#8217;s school, <a href="http://www.sgws.org" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Spring Garden Waldorf,</a> brings this up to me almost every time I see her.</p>
<p>One of her all time most engaged Facebook page posts is this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/waldorf-vargo.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3499" title="waldorf-vargo" src="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/waldorf-vargo.jpg" alt="" width="606" height="206" /></a></p>
<p>It was a quick post she tossed up about an upcoming children&#8217;s festival. She shakes her head about it every time the topic comes up. Of all the really interesting, useful, &#8220;important&#8221; posts, this one gets the most engagement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to say &#8220;because I&#8217;m the expert&#8221; it happened because of X,Y and Z. But I have no clue why people like what they like.</p>
<p>If I were going to pick some of the articles I thought would make the biggest impact, this would be my list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/netflix-marketing-advice/">4 Free Web Marketing Tips To Netflix</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/journalism-in-2011-occupy-wall-street/">Journalism in 2011 &#8211; Information Wants To Be Free</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/why-you-should-never-use-googles-free-adwords-service/">Why You Should Never Use Google&#8217;s &#8220;Free&#8221; AdWords Service</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/dont-just-sit-there-follow-20-people-on-twitter-now/">How To Find 20 New GOOD Twitter People To Follow</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/seo-pricin/">SageRock SEO Pricing Guide Revealed</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/lets-skin-this-social-media-link-building-cat/">Let’s Skin This Social Media Link Building Cat</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/googleplus/">Google+ Resource Guide</a></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have been more wrong.</p>
<h1>These are the 10 most viewed articles for 2011:</h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Title</th>
<th>Views</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Author</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/title-tag-meta-description-length/" target="_blank">Title Tag and Meta Description Length for Google, Yahoo, Bing &amp; Ask</a></td>
<td>28,094</td>
<td>AUGUST 5, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-mobile-keyword-tool/" target="_blank">Google Mobile Keyword Tool</a></td>
<td>1,447</td>
<td>MAY 21, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/joe/"title="Posts by Joe"  rel="author">JOE</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wolframalpha-not-google-killer/" target="_blank">WolframAlpha – Not a Google Killer</a></td>
<td>769</td>
<td>MAY 11, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-adwords-vs-msn-adcenter/" target="_blank">Google AdWords vs MSN adCenter – Comparison Chart</a></td>
<td>733</td>
<td>DECEMBER 8, 2010</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/contact-seo/" target="_blank">You Can Find SEO at the Top of the Mountain if You Bring the SEO with You.</a></td>
<td>607</td>
<td>FEBRUARY 25, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/brian/"title="Posts by Brian"  rel="author">BRIAN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-product-listing-ads/" target="_blank">Product Listing Ads – Google’s PPC Christmas Gift</a></td>
<td>602</td>
<td>DECEMBER 6, 2010</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/separate-twitter-from-facebook/" target="_blank">Separate Twitter from Facebook</a></td>
<td>498</td>
<td>JULY 20, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/adwords-preview-tool/" target="_blank">Google Adwords Preview Tool</a></td>
<td>410</td>
<td>MARCH 16, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/why-you-should-never-use-googles-free-adwords-service/" target="_blank">Why You Should Never Use Google’s “Free” AdWords Service</a></td>
<td>404</td>
<td>NOVEMBER 9, 2011</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/sage/"title="Posts by Sage Lewis"  rel="author">SAGE LEWIS</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-search-query-report/" target="_blank">Google Search Query Report</a></td>
<td>403</td>
<td>JUNE 26, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/kate/"title="Posts by Kate Falconer"  rel="author">KATE FALCONER</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The most viewed one, written by Greg, is 20x&#8217;s the amount of traffic of anything else on our site. It drives more traffic than the other 10 top pages combined. Maybe even closer to the 20 top pages, now that I look at it.</p>
<p>There are two particularly interesting pieces of information that jump out here to me:</p>
<ol>
<li>Only one of those articles was written by me. That&#8217;s concerning to me simply because I&#8217;m now the primary writer of the blog. I don&#8217;t particularly care if I&#8217;m not the best writer (which I&#8217;m quite sure I&#8217;m not, in our group), I just want the best, most interesting content for our blog. If other people&#8217;s content is better than mine it makes me think that maybe I should be doing something else with my time and get one of these people to write the blog.</li>
<ol>
<li>That said, most of these articles were written at a time when I wasn&#8217;t the primary writer. We were all writing for the blog. (Also Greg&#8217;s idea.) Maybe people enjoyed seeing the variety.</li>
<li>But why would they care about the variety now? It&#8217;s just an article in a sea of articles.</li>
</ol>
<li>All of these articles, except for that last one <strong>were written before 2011! 7</strong> of those 10 articles were written in 2009. Only one was written in 2011. That means that this blog has been years in the making.</li>
</ol>
<p>I have three possible theories for why this has happened:</p>
<ol>
<li>It takes time to build up links to an article. And then it takes time for those links to be given weight by Google. I think I might put on my calendar this time next year to compare these stats with the stats of 2012. If the winners of 2012 continue to be these articles then we can assume they are just better articles&#8230; or are better optimized for the search engines.</li>
<li>These are just, plain and simple, good articles. They resonated with the audience and continue to do so.</li>
<li>These articles were marketed well. I know, for example, that Brian had an in with a big design blog. He wrote a series of articles for them and they linked back to us. Greg also does a good job of posting his stuff to places like Digg and Stumble.</li>
</ol>
<p>We might be able to gain some more knowledge if we take a step back.</p>
<p>Here is a list of the top 10 articles of all time:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Title</th>
<th>Views</th>
<th>Date</th>
<th>Author</th>
<th>On 2011 Top 10?</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/title-tag-meta-description-length/" target="_blank">Title Tag and Meta Description Length for Google, Yahoo, Bing &amp; Ask</a></td>
<td>49,986</td>
<td>AUGUST 5, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wolframalpha-not-google-killer/" target="_blank">WolframAlpha – Not a Google Killer</a></td>
<td>4,679</td>
<td>MAY 11, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-mobile-keyword-tool/" target="_blank">Google Mobile Keyword Tool</a></td>
<td>3,356</td>
<td>MAY 21, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/joe/"title="Posts by Joe"  rel="author">JOE</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/favrd/" target="_blank">FAVRD – Let Your Caged Bird Sing.. on Twitter</a></td>
<td>2,336</td>
<td>APRIL 14, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/contact-seo/" target="_blank">You Can Find SEO at the Top of the Mountain if You Bring the SEO with You.</a></td>
<td>2,065</td>
<td>FEBRUARY 25, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/brian/"title="Posts by Brian"  rel="author">BRIAN</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/increase-web-traffic-part-1/" target="_blank">Increase Web Traffic: Part 1 of 4</a></td>
<td>1,853</td>
<td>MARCH 11, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/brian/"title="Posts by Brian"  rel="author">BRIAN</a></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/adwords-preview-tool/" target="_blank">Google Adwords Preview Tool</a></td>
<td>1,302</td>
<td>MARCH 16, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/separate-twitter-from-facebook/" target="_blank">Separate Twitter from Facebook</a></td>
<td>1,265</td>
<td>JULY 20, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/greg/"title="Posts by Greg Habermann"  rel="author">GREG HABERMANN</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-search-query-report/" target="_blank">Google Search Query Report</a></td>
<td>1,257</td>
<td>JUNE 26, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/kate/"title="Posts by Kate Falconer"  rel="author">KATE FALCONER</a></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/increase-web-traffic-part-2-of-4/" target="_blank">Increase Web Traffic: Part 2 of 4</a></td>
<td>1,128</td>
<td>APRIL 8, 2009</td>
<td><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/author/brian/"title="Posts by Brian"  rel="author">BRIAN</a></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Every single one of those articles was written in 2009. And every single one of those was NOT written by me.</strong></p>
<p>Why was 2009 such a good year for our blog posts? More people writing? More variety? But that shouldn&#8217;t matter in these stats. These articles continue to get traffic because of search traffic. But they are getting the search traffic because people linked to them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. (Don&#8217;t think you are going to get to the end of this article to find some big &#8220;ah ha!&#8221; moment. I don&#8217;t know why this is happening.)</p>
<p>And while we are slicing and dicing facts, here are all the users that have posted to the blog over time, including their total number of posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/srblog-users.jpg"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-3513" title="srblog-users" src="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/srblog-users.jpg" alt="" width="610" height="504" /></a></p>
<p>I have posted 10 times more than Greg. Yet he has been in the top 10 articles WAY more than me.</p>
<p>Looking at these numbers, I would say that he is, by far, the better writer, or better said, he is the writer people appreciate the most.</p>
<p>However, I am the &#8220;Long Tail&#8221; of this story. I actually still win in total traffic.</p>
<p>If you look at the total number of views of articles that I have written and Greg has written here are those stats:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sage: 188,140 views</li>
<li>Greg: 119,748 views</li>
</ul>
<p>I beat him on brute force.</p>
<p>Here are a couple bar graphs representing views and posts comparisons of Greg and me:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/view-posts-graph.jpg"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-3519" title="view-posts-graph" src="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/view-posts-graph.jpg" alt="" width="610" height="345" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>An aside:</p>
<p>So this has actually turned into an analysis that represents the fundamental role I play in the world.</p>
<p>As I look at the people in our business and my friends, I can&#8217;t think of one person who I would consider myself equal to on smarts, intuition, emotional intelligence. I consider all of them (every single one) more advanced than me.</p>
<p>If I were to let other people who are better than me do the work I would have nothing to do. I&#8217;m pretty sure I have someone around me who could do pretty much every single thing I do better than me.</p>
<p>The only reason I think they agree to hang around me at all is because I don&#8217;t quit. I am an endless wave of pressure. That&#8217;s my one and only gift.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the mystery of this analysis is: If Greg wrote 256 articles for us would he be able to out do my total amount of 188,140 views. I would say that&#8217;s probably no mystery at all. <strong>Of course he would.</strong></p>
<p>But Greg has many talents. And some of his talents surpass me so far that I shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to ever go near some of the things he does (Quickbooks, payroll, overall operations organization, etc.).</p>
<p>There are some areas that I&#8217;m trying to get him to let go so that he could do other things&#8230; like write here at the blog. But he is a methodical person and wants to make those transitions carefully and slowly (another skill I completely lack and can&#8217;t even really comprehend).</p>
<h1> Conclusion</h1>
<p>While I can&#8217;t tell you <em>why</em> things are happening here, that doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t things we can learn. This is what the data tells us:</p>
<ul>
<li>Who cares what people like. <strong>Give the people what they want.</strong> The longer you try to stuff a square peg into a round hole the longer you will make your life harder for yourself.</li>
<li>Take a moment and look at the total page views of your site. See what people have liked the most from you and give them more of that.</li>
<li>Appreciate the long tail. I am very comfortable in admitting I&#8217;m not as compelling as someone like Greg. But I also don&#8217;t totally suck. <strong>Don&#8217;t feel like you need to be a Pulitzer prize writer to put out a blog.</strong> <em>Just Do It.</em> It&#8217;s the &#8220;doing&#8221; and &#8220;trying&#8221; that will make you successful.</li>
<li>Trust the stats &#8211; not what you &#8220;think&#8221; and &#8220;believe.&#8221; <strong>This drives me crazy.</strong> I see focus groups, committees and C-level executives making decisions completely in a vacuum. Don&#8217;t trust your intuition. Trust your stats. Test everything!</li>
<ul>
<li>I could go on and on about this one point (and maybe some day I will). But just because you are the &#8220;expert&#8221; and know your industry better than anyone <strong>doesn&#8217;t mean you know shit. </strong>In fact, you probably know less than most everyone else. Your perspective is myopic and warped. You actually should be <strong>the last person</strong> making any &#8220;executive&#8221; decisions on what your customers want. (Phew. I had to get that out. I feel better now.)</li>
</ul>
<li>People usually look at stats and then change things to get visitors to do more of what they want them to do&#8230; like increase conversion rates on a form. What if you looked at your stats as a public survey? &#8220;The visitors say they like this. Let&#8217;s give them more of that.&#8221; It&#8217;s a reverse view than the one we most often take. But it&#8217;s probably the view that will give us a better return ultimately.</li>
</ul>
<p>There you have it: The Top 10 most viewed SageRock blog articles and what the stats mean to you. I&#8217;m excited to start digging into 2012.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-10-most-viewed-sagerock-blog-articles-of-2011/">The 10 Most Viewed SageRock Blog Articles of 2011</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-10-most-viewed-sagerock-blog-articles-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Top Tweets From SES Chicago #seschi</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/my-top-tweets-from-ses-chicago-seschi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/my-top-tweets-from-ses-chicago-seschi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=3286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, unfortunately I could only stay a couple days at Search Engine Strategies this time. I&#8217;m running back to Ohio to teach my University of Findlay class tonight. But I thought I might post some of the notes I took at the conference. I got a lot of really good stats, tips and concepts (as [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/my-top-tweets-from-ses-chicago-seschi/">My Top Tweets From SES Chicago #seschi</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, unfortunately I could only stay a couple days at Search Engine Strategies this time. I&#8217;m running back to Ohio to teach my <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/university-of-findlay-class-update/"title="University of Findlay Class Update" >University of Findlay class</a> tonight.</p>
<p>But I thought I might post some of the notes I took at the conference. I got a lot of really good stats, tips and concepts (as usual).</p>
<p>Here are my tweets (<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/sagerock" rel="nofollow" >http://twitter.com/sagerock</a>) for the hashtags: #seschi and #omschi:</p>
<p>1st step is to convince people that social matters. Maybe make your own study so you can truly quantify social. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>Conversion Buddy is a new tool that helps you track to the conversion of socially shared links. <a href="http://t.co/G8wo2buH"title="http://buddymedia.com/products/conversationbuddy"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7uiNQ" data-ultimate-url="http://buddymedia.com/products/conversationbuddy" data-display-url="ow.ly/7uiNQ">http://ow.ly/7uiNQ</a><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/datadivadalley" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="datadivadalley"><s>@</s><strong>datadivadalley</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good (and the first) live blogging writeup of the Mikel Chertudi <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> keynote. <a href="http://t.co/LhVIMsBu"title="http://www.jonathanjeter.com/?p=120"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7ucg5" data-ultimate-url="http://www.jonathanjeter.com/?p=120" data-display-url="ow.ly/7ucg5">http://ow.ly/7ucg5</a></p>
<p>MarketShare &#8211; an affordable solution for attribution tracking if $10k &#8211; $20k for metrics is chump change for u. <a href="http://t.co/lE3g79WQ"title="http://www.marketshare.com/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7ubUx" data-ultimate-url="http://www.marketshare.com/" data-display-url="ow.ly/7ubUx">http://ow.ly/7ubUx</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>Video: Demographic Makeup of SES Chicago 2011 Attendees<a href="http://t.co/jaRoKaFG"title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVuyscmzuac&amp;feature=share"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVuyscmzuac&amp;feature=share" data-display-url="youtube.com/watch?v=bVuysc…">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVuyscmzuac&amp;feature=share</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>By 2020 there will be 50 billion connected devices on the planet.<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/mikegrehan" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="mikegrehan"><s>@</s><strong>mikegrehan</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>FTC says: You have to disclose your affiliation if you have a material connection. Consider: <a href="http://t.co/EY6UaPte"title="http://cmp.ly/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://cmp.ly" data-ultimate-url="http://cmp.ly/" data-display-url="cmp.ly">http://cmp.ly</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23omschi"title="#omschi"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>omschi</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="http://t.co/iCbIBGyi"title="http://www.dirtyphonebook.com/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://Dirtyphonebook.com" data-ultimate-url="http://www.dirtyphonebook.com/" data-display-url="Dirtyphonebook.com">http://Dirtyphonebook.com</a> - you can look people up by number &amp; make anonymous calls. &#8220;That can&#8217;t be legal.&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23omschi"title="#omschi"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>omschi</strong></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s your Twitter tip of the day: Tweet conferences you attend. 2051 followers at 8am &#8211; 2073 at 2pm.<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>Find the bloggers that are likely to engage in comments. You will develop a relationship a lot faster. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/adamproehl" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="adamproehl"><s>@</s><strong>adamproehl</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>Search Podcasts on iTunes or Amazon to see popularity. These people most likely are on Twitter &amp; have a blog. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/adamproehl" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="adamproehl"><s>@</s><strong>adamproehl</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>Klout &#8211; shows what kind of fish you are in which pond. The number by itself means nothing. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/adamproehl" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="adamproehl"><s>@</s><strong>adamproehl</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a> <a href="http://t.co/sw5BJKOW"title="http://klout.com/home"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7sVOX" data-ultimate-url="http://klout.com/home" data-display-url="ow.ly/7sVOX">http://ow.ly/7sVOX</a></p>
<p>Followerwonk &#8211; enter a keyword &amp; shows people that talk a lot about that topic. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/adamproehl" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="adamproehl"><s>@</s><strong>adamproehl</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a><a href="http://t.co/EXmD8b24"title="http://followerwonk.com/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7sVEC" data-ultimate-url="http://followerwonk.com/" data-display-url="ow.ly/7sVEC">http://ow.ly/7sVEC</a></p>
<p>BlogPulse is a good place to find influential blogs <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/adamproehl" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="adamproehl"><s>@</s><strong>adamproehl</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a> <a href="http://t.co/dDLk7XGH"title="http://www.blogpulse.com/"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7sVuO" data-ultimate-url="http://www.blogpulse.com/" data-display-url="ow.ly/7sVuO">http://ow.ly/7sVuO</a></p>
<p>Here is my first video at the OMS Social Media Summit <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a> <a href="http://t.co/FGv9j97A"title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw61Yq69QjQ"  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" data-expanded-url="http://ow.ly/7sTQz" data-ultimate-url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw61Yq69QjQ" data-display-url="ow.ly/7sTQz">http://ow.ly/7sTQz</a></p>
<p>Digital advertising to the CMO is just one big bucket. (TV, print, digital) so social is currently 1 small part. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>The top 100 advertisers have very serious Facebook presences.<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>Exposed Fans also tend to spend more at Starbucks than non-fans. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>The single biggest time spent on Facebook is on the Newsfeed (48%). So that&#8217;s where most brand exposure happens.<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23OMSCHI"title="#OMSCHI"  rel="nofollow"><s>#</s><strong>OMSCHI</strong></a></p>
<p>95% of people that check in use Facebook Places. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>85% of U.S. Internet users visit a social media site. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/LosBuenos" rel="nofollow" data-screen-name="LosBuenos"><s>@</s><strong>LosBuenos</strong></a> <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23seschi"title="#seschi"  rel="nofollow"><s><strong>#</strong></s><strong><strong>seschi</strong></strong></a></p>
<p>If you are interested in more stuff like this you can follow me here:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/sagerock" rel="nofollow" >http://twitter.com/#!/sagerock</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/my-top-tweets-from-ses-chicago-seschi/">My Top Tweets From SES Chicago #seschi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/my-top-tweets-from-ses-chicago-seschi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Boggs To Speak at today&#8217;s Web Association Event</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/chris-boggs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/chris-boggs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=3238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the first picture I came across on Google that had both me and Chris in it. Chris is the moderator in this particular panel. It&#8217;s not a clear picture of either of us. He&#8217;s the person on the right sitting down. Here&#8217;s a better picture of Chris: He&#8217;s the person on the left [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/chris-boggs/">Chris Boggs To Speak at today&#8217;s Web Association Event</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3567/3818518620_90c629b83c.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>This was the first picture I came across on Google that had both me and Chris in it. Chris is the moderator in this particular panel. It&#8217;s not a clear picture of either of us. He&#8217;s the person on the right sitting down.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a better picture of Chris:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1122/1204927438_7122bca5d7.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>He&#8217;s the person on the left here.</p>
<p>I could probably just make this a photo post of Chris surrounded by the biggest thought leaders in our industry.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a nice one of Chris and Jim Boykin:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/marketing-resources/chris-boggs.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="173" /></p>
<p>The reason Chris Boggs is always seen in pictures with our industry&#8217;s thought leaders is because <strong>he is part of the search marketing thought leader crowd.</strong></p>
<p>There are probably a dozen people I could think of that I would consider the cream of the search engine marketing crop. 12 people that really push our industry forward. People that help set the tone and direction of where search engine optimization has gone for the last decade and where it will go for the coming decade. <strong>Chris Boggs is in that list of 12.</strong></p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: Chris is a fellow Northeastern Ohioan. He lives right up the road from me.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.sempo.org/?page=board_of_directors" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">The President of SEMPO</a> (Search Engine Marketing Professional&#8217;s Organization) lives in Cleveland Ohio.</strong></p>
<p>Chris is also the Director of Search and Media Thought Leadership at <a href="http://www.rosetta.com" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Rosetta</a></p>
<p>Here are some of the many places you can find Chris online:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/author/1806/chris-boggs" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs &#8211; Search Engine Watch (#SEW)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisboggs" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs | LinkedIn</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.onlinemarketingsummit.com/chris-boggs" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs &#8211; Speakers at OMS Online Marketing Conference, Online Marketing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.onlinemarketingsummit.com/chris-boggs" rel="nofollow" >Training Courses &amp; Online Marketing Best Practices</a></li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/#!/boggles" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs (boggles) on Twitter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/author/chris-boggs/34.html" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs&#8217;s Search Engine Roundtable Articles</a></li>
<li><a href="https://plus.google.com/104023451920714923588/posts" rel="nofollow" >Chris Boggs &#8211; Google+</a></li>
<li><a href="http://chrisboggs.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow" >Search Marketing Thoughts</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Hey! Why doesn&#8217;t he have a Wikipedia page? <strong>Will someone get this guy a page on Wikipedia!?</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>You are can read all the impressive aspects of Chris&#8217; career in those links above. They truly are impressive.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fun to look back over the years and remember things we&#8217;ve done together. I&#8217;ve eaten sushi with Chris in San Jose. I&#8217;ve frozen my ass off to get to tasty gourmet burger place with Chris in Chicago. I&#8217;m sure I ate something with Chris at some point in New York. We&#8217;ve spoken on multiple panels together in various cities. We&#8217;ve worked on projects together even though we are at two different firms.</p>
<p>Search engine marketing has been good to me over the years. But one of the particularly nice things about search engine marketing are the friends I&#8217;ve made in the industry. I&#8217;m proud to call Chris a friend. And I&#8217;m proud to call him a fellow Northeastern Ohioan.</p>
<p>If you are free this afternoon (and in Cleveland) consider checking him out at today&#8217;s Web Association event. Today&#8217;s topic is &#8220;<a href="http://www.webassociation.org/2011/11/04/what-is-up-at-google-panda-google-" rel="nofollow" >What is up at Google? Panda ? Google + ?</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Chris is tying together the search and social aspects of Google that are happening right now.</p>
<p>And if you aren&#8217;t in Cleveland or can&#8217;t make this event, keep an eye out for him. He&#8217;s speaking or writing all the time. He&#8217;s worth checking out.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work, Chris! (See you in  a couple hours.)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/chris-boggs/">Chris Boggs To Speak at today&#8217;s Web Association Event</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/chris-boggs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crap! I failed you.</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/crap-i-failed-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/crap-i-failed-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been making a serious attempt at getting you an article every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. But I have completely failed you today. This kind of thing is hard to quantify. But I think this is possibly one of the busiest times of my life. At the very least &#8211; it&#8217;s way up there. [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/crap-i-failed-you/">Crap! I failed you.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been making a serious attempt at getting you an article every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. But I have completely failed you today.</p>
<p>This kind of thing is hard to quantify. But I think this is possibly one of the busiest times of my life. At the very least &#8211; it&#8217;s way up there.</p>
<p>So I totally am not able to write a real article for you today.</p>
<p>But here are two things for you:</p>
<p>First &#8211; check out this video (it has nothing to do with Web marketing but it&#8217;s my favorite video of the week)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZsKqbt3gQ0" rel="nofollow" >www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZsKqbt3gQ0</a></p>
<p>Second &#8211; below is a list of my Google Reader shared items. (I&#8217;m also going to be updating these in the right hand navigation of the home page as well.) These are the most recent Web marketing articles that I felt were interesting.</p>
<ul class='cets_embedRSS'>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/V-GaSZW5ePY/google-webmaster-tools-provides-details-on-duplicate-content-across-domains-99246http://searchengineland.com' title='Today, Google webmaster tools has launched a new message alert to let site owners know when a particular URL doesn’t appear because Google sees it as duplicate of a URL on a different domain. In the blog post announcing the feature and in an in-depth help topic, they provide details on how...  Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.        '>Do You Have Duplicate Content Issues Across Domain? Google Will Now Alert YouSearch Engine Land: News &amp; Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines &amp; Search Marketing</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2011/10/controversial-blogging/http://blog.bruceclay.com/' title='How Not to Suck at Controversial Blogging was originally published on BruceClay.com, home of expert search engine optimization tips.You’ve probably heard that writing controversial blog posts is a sure-fire way to attract new readers. You’ve also probably heard it dismissed as a gimmick. Well, just because it’s a gimmick doesn’t mean it won’t work – you just have to be careful how you use it.        If done correctly, the short-term attention generated by your controversial blog post can be used to expand your blog’s readership and attract links. Here’s some tips on how to create a solid blog post when attempting to tackle a controversial topic. Choosing a Controversial Post Topic Pick a topic in your blog’s niche, or at least related to it. The whole idea is to convert new visitors into regular subscribers, so you want to attract the kind of visitors who would be interested in reading your blog on a regular basis.If the topic has nothing to do with the rest of your blog, those visitors will move on to something else. Remember that controversy = divided opinion + emotional investment. If your topic stirs up emotion but you take a popular stance, you’re not being controversial. Likewise, if you defend the minority opinion but no one is deeply invested in the argument, there’s no controversy there, either. Pick a position you actually believe in. Don’t play devil’s advocate or take the less popular stance just because it’s less popular – find an issue where your position runs against the mainstream. People are going to subscribe to your blog because they respect what you have to say and how you say it, whether or not they agree with you. If your viewpoint is inconsistent from post to post, readers will think you’re not genuine. Writing a Controversial Blog Post Don’t just state your uneducated opinion; present facts and then comment on them. The more logical your argument, the more your readers will need to engage with your ideas in order to comment back. An opinion asserted without evidence can be dismissed easier than a well-constructed argument backed with empirical facts. Don’t try to be definitive. Your argument shouldn’t be airtight, nor should you try to address all possible counterarguments. You’re trying to kick off a dialogue, not write the perfect essay. Leaving holes in your argument will help ensure someone will feel the need to point them out to you in the comments section. Publish your controversial post at the beginning of the week. There’s a reason bad news is always announced on Fridays, after the markets have closed and everyone has gone home: the hope is that the media will forget about the bad news over the weekend and have something fresh by Monday. So, do the opposite. Publish on a Monday so your post can go viral all week instead of fizzling out over the weekend. As with all gimmicks, controversy quickly loses its effectiveness if overused. Space out the posts you hope will attract controversy. If you advertise your new posts via Twitter, Facebook or other social media, then promote your controversial posts to a much greater extent than the others. That way, even your regular readers will know these posts are special. Defending Your Controversial Blog Post Stand your ground. Once comments start coming in, you’ll have posters insulting you, your blog, your dog, your dog’s blog, etc. That’s great! It means you got a reaction out of a complete stranger, so your controversial blog post is working as intended. Unless they’re abusive or otherwise violate your posting guidelines, don’t delete those negative comments – wear them as a badge of honor. Don’t get personal. Anonymous posters have nothing to lose if they make themselves look like total jerks. You, on the other hand, are trying to attract new readers and elicit thoughtful comments. So keep in mind that there’s a difference between respectfully disagreeing with your readers and baselessly insulting them, dummy. Respond to only the highest quality comments. You want to reward the folks who actually take time to engage with your argument, whether or not they agree with you. After all, they’re more likely to tell others about your blog post or link to you from their blogs. And the longer you keep the conversation going, the more long-term readers you’ll attract. So, what did I forget? What did I get completely wrong? Any examples of controversial blog posts done well, or done poorly? Respond below and I’ll try not to be a jerk. '>How Not to Suck at Controversial BloggingBruce Clay Blog</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/Mashable/~3/9VV3EfC885E/http://mashable.com' title='   Despite recent troubles, Netflix is a major force on the Internet, accounting for 32.7% of peak U.S. downstream traffic, according to a new report. Sandvine Intelligent Broadband Networks’ report analyzed 200 Internet service providers in 80 countries and found that real-time entertainment apps take up 60% of peak downstream traffic, up from 50% last year. Netflix has more than half of that share. Sandvine considers the hours between 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. to be peak times.  Like others, Sandvine has also noticed a shift away from PCs to access such content. The company found 55% of traffic volume in North America is consumed on game consoles, set-top boxes, smart TVs and mobile devices. Only 45% is being accessed by laptops or PCs. Video makes up 32.6% of peak downstream mobile traffic, of which YouTube is the largest contributor. The report comes as Netflix recently lost 800,000 paid subscribers in its most-recent quarter. The company’s stock is now trading at less than a third of the amount it was in July.   BONUS: Timeline: How Netflix Lost Two-Thirds of Its Value in 3 Months               1. Netflix Stock Hits All-Time High                             July 13, 2011  Netflix stock more than doubled over the previous year, then increased by 15% in May to reach its last all-time high in July of $300. Click here to view this gallery. More About: netflix, Sandvine, trendingFor more Entertainment coverage:Follow Mashable Entertainment on TwitterBecome a Fan on FacebookSubscribe to the Entertainment channelDownload our free apps for Android, Mac, iPhone and iPad            '>Netflix Takes Up 32.7% of Internet Bandwidth [STUDY]Mashable!</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/MAbXe3kQGD4/google-launches-adwords-premier-smb-partner-program-98504http://searchengineland.com' title='Google is introducing what it calls its “AdWords Premier SMB Partner Program.” It’s essentially a vendor referral program for small business (SMB) advertisers interested in working with AdWords. Google has developed a list of companies, many of whom were part of its...  Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.        '>Google Launches “AdWords Premier SMB Partner Program”Search Engine Land: News &amp; Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines &amp; Search Marketing</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/J1brpiNKsv0/google-tweaks-competition-rank-in-adwords-keyword-tool-98510http://searchengineland.com' title='Many users are now seeing a change in the way that Google’s Keyword Ranking tool is providing competition data.  Instead of the traditional bars to display competitiveness, Google is now using text as the description. Up until now,this tool used small green bars to display the competitiveness...  Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.        '>Google Tweaks Competition Rank In AdWords Keyword Tool To “Low,” “Medium” or “High”Search Engine Land: News &amp; Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines &amp; Search Marketing</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zoriah/Rtel/~3/nIarOj1v3q0/how-to-become-a-photojournalist.htmlhttp://www.zoriah.net/blog/' title='Introduction:   I get dozens of emails every week from individuals around the world asking how they can become a photojournalist.  It is a difficult question and unfortunately there are no easy answers.  There is probably one way to become a photojournalist for every one of us that is working today.However, I do understand the curiosity and there is quite a lot of mystery surrounding the subject.  People want to know if it is better to study photojournalism in a university, graduate program or just go out into the field and build a portfolio?  Is it better to work with a photo agency or wire service or have a go at it on your own?  Where do I start? What do I do?  Is it even possible?  How long does it take?  How much money will I need to get started?     Again, there are no single answers to the above questions.  However, I can tell you a bit about my own personal experiences and share some thoughts and opinions I have formed over the years.  Please don&#039;t take what I write as a bible, merely stories and suggestions that may help some of you as you begin your path to becoming a photojournalist.      Am I a good enough photographer?  Probably not.  But don&#039;t get too depressed, like anything in life it is just something you have to learn.  My &quot;eye&quot; is no better than anyone else&#039;s....it has just spent a long time looking through viewfinders and that is the only secret.  Like most things in life, photography is something you learn and not some magical gift some people are given.  This is good news because it means that you can be just as good or even better than any of us!      What do I do first?  The first step is to take some time to do some serious thinking and soul searching.  Is this something you really, really want? Do you know what you are getting yourself into and how it will affect your life?  Take a while to consider the things you might see and experience and think about how they will affect you.  Once you have seen something you can&#039;t un-see it.  Take the most disturbing film or news footage you have ever seen and multiply it a few hundred times...then you may have the beginning of an idea of what it is like to see these things in real life.      Consider what it will be like to come back home and visit with friends knowing that no matter how well you describe your experiences they will still not have any real comprehension of what it is you experienced.  Think about how this will distance you.  Consider how it will effect those that care about you.    Take some time to really learn about what the lives of photojournalists are like on a day to day basis.  Read a couple of books written by someone who is doing or has done what you are planning on.  See some movies and documentaries (i will make a post giving some suggestions on books and films in the next couple of months.      Take the picture you have in your head of the life of a photojournalist and subtract fifty percent of the romance and add 200% more discomfort.    Now, if you still think you can make a difference in the world by becoming a photojournalist and you think you can do it without shooting yourself or becoming as raging alcoholic, let&#039;s talk about what might come next.    Focus:  Yes, you will have to learn how to focus your lens at some point but first let&#039;s focus your head.  You will need to start thinking about what kinds of subject matter you want to document before you go any further.   During your weeks of soul searching, if you decide that you don&#039;t want to give up your whole life, your family, your country of origin etc for this job... start thinking about what kinds of subjects you can document in your own country or own neighborhood.  This is the best way for anyone to start out in photojournalism...do it in your your own &quot;backyard&quot; and do it NOW.      If you decide to cover subjects in far away lands, start thinking about how you will afford to get there and what will happen with your apartment, bills, possessions etc while you are gone.  If you have a husband or wife, boyfriend or girlfriend, pet, plans, fish...anything like this, now is the time to think about how this will effect them.    How long will it take?  I am putting this section before the How Much Will It Cost section because the two go together but how much it costs will depend on how long it takes you before you start getting paid.    When I began shooting I became friends with a very experienced photo editor who gave me lots of interesting advice and shared many stories with me.  I remember one day I was on the phone with her, if I remember correctly I was in a horrible little Internet cafe in southern Sri Lanka in the wake of the Tsunami.  I was frustrated with my recent photo sales and she told me &quot;It takes a photojournalist an average of five years of shooting full time before they sell their first image and another five before they can make a living at it.&quot;.  After attempting to slit my wrists I realized I was actually quite far ahead of the curve.  But looking back at many of the other photographers I started out with and figuring in my own ups and downs, I believe her statement is fairly accurate.    The point is that this job is incredibly difficult and it gets more and more competitive every minute, as the world is flooded with cheap, good quality digital cameras and thousands of individuals desiring this job.  Add into this formula the quickly changing publishing industry, photo agencies and publishers doing away with paid assignments and traveling shooters, and it all adds up to an increasingly difficult job to break into.    How much will it cost  Here is another extremely difficult question to answer.  I spent two years in Asia living on around $200 a month when I started out.  I relied on the kindness and support of many people during those days and I will be forever be grateful to all of them.  I shot on a cheap, used, consumer camera for my first three years and shot only jpeg images because I could not afford an external hard drive to backup RAW images to.  It was tough, and my lack of funds in some ways held me back but in other ways they taught me how to be resourceful which became a huge factor in the development of my style.  Here are some thoughts on that:     I could never afford to stay in nice hotels so I always stayed in pension houses in impoverished areas with the locals.  I could never afford drivers or translators so I walked wherever I needed to go and made friends instead of business contacts.  During the tsunami when staff shooters from big publications flooded in and drove the cost of rooms up I stayed on the floor in a refugee camp.  In iraq I slept wherever the infantry soldiers slept and never in press quarters, hotels or with the top brass...unlike most of the journalists who worked there.    Decisions that were initially a necessity do to lack of money but they ended up allowing me to get the images (and experiences) others were not able to get.  They allowed me to have a deeply personal connection with my subject matter and that is translated to the images.  I have chosen to continue working this way even though my days of living on $200 a month are over.     What is the secret?  In my opinion there are really only two major factors in the success formula for photojournalism.  Here they are with a description for each:    1.) Take great photos:    If you want this job to work out for you, you will have to learn to take really exceptional photos.  There are so may photographers who come and go, and most of them are taking snapshots.  If you shoot like a fine art photographer but document photo-journalistic subject matter, you will set yourself apart from the crowd.     Shooting exceptional images that can be considered art will open many doors for you.  Where a press photographer or wire shooter will take snapshots that newspapers will publish, a fine art photographer has the chance to make books, have exhibitions, lecture at universities, create their own websites to draw in viewers and fans etc.  Anyone can take snapshots but it takes time to learn how to create art (and no, I am not saying that all press photographers take snap shots, many are wonderful artists.)    2.) Put in The Time:  There have been many photojournalists who have done well with the first part of this formula and learned how to create outstanding images.  Unfortunately many have reached this point and decided that since people were not knocking their doors down offering them money, that it must be a lost cause.      It takes a lot of time and work in order to get your images noticed.  For me it was a matter of learning web design so that I could create my own websites and even more importantly, update them as my work grew and improved.  I started out with one site and then added more and more year after year.  My friends pushed me to create a blog, which I finally did and ended up with the very first photojournalism and war photography blog.  And even that required time to catch on.  I worked on posts full time for months before I had any real traffic and it was a matter of more than a year before my blogs posts regularly ranked on the front page of google.    A formal education in photojournalism/photography or real world/ in- field experience?  While education is always important, most photojournalists believe that this is a job that is difficult to teach in a classroom and you must learn by it by actually doing it.  I tend to agree with this, although I urge young photographers to consider a formal education in addition to real world experience if time and money will allow for it.  The bottom line is that you will not learn everything you need to in order to be successful if you ignore either one.  The good news is that there are incredible resources for studying and learning about photojournalism online, so if you don&#039;t have a lot of money but you are dedicated and persistent, you can learn most things on your own.  I will begin to publish more links and stories that I believe will be helpful to those starting out in photojournalism.    I have had two workshop students who have graduated with certificate degrees in photojournalism from well known, established schools in the United States and in Paris.  My personal opinion is that these students did not get a good photojournalism education from these programs, especially considering the time and money they put into them.  One of the students told me that they learned more in my seven day intensive photojournalism workshop than they did in their one year certificate program abroad, which confirmed to me that workshops can be a great way for students to get started on their path in photojournalism.    Workshops:  There are countless photojournalism workshops offered around the world and many of them offer young photographers the opportunity to learn directly from well known, working photojournalists.  They range in price from around $1000 to $10,000 for five to ten day programs and vary greatly in both quality and content.    To sum it all up:  Here is a good way to think about whether or not you can succeed as a photojournalist:  if you are willing to work for five years, not only without pay but PAYING to work out of your own pocket, then I think you have a pretty good chance.  But understand that when I say &quot;work&quot; I really mean WORK.  You need to be willing to put in far more than a full time job would require.  You will need to be able to endure extended periods of extreme discomfort, difficult and shocking traumas as well as some pretty extreme boredom at times (I know it is hard to believe, but trust me, aspects of this work can be really boring...Itype this on a plane in the middle of 42 hours of straight travel time.)    Note:  I will address many of these points in more detail in future posts.  I am also working on a post regarding How To Become A War Photographer in which I will offer some advice on that subject, an even more difficult job and way of life.  Please take all of my thoughts and suggestions as nothing more than one photojournalists opinion and make sure you consider others advice as well before making up your own mind.        '>How To Become a PhotojournalistZORIAH - A PHOTOJOURNALIST AND WAR PHOTOGRAPHER&#039;S BLOG</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/yOXIeIfGrDE/google-says-seo-is-not-spam-98266http://searchengineland.com' title='Matt Cutts, head of the Google’s web spam fighting team, has gone on record by saying Google does not consider SEO to be spam. Matt said outright, “We don’t consider SEO to be spam,” and added that SEO is “a valid way to help people find what they’re looking for...  Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.        '>Google Says SEO Is Not SpamSearch Engine Land: News &amp; Info About SEO, PPC, SEM, Search Engines &amp; Search Marketing</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sew/~3/Gp4Ssog0G_o/85.3-of-the-U.S.-Internet-Audience-Viewed-Online-Videos-in-September-2011http://searchenginewatch.com/' title='Matt Cutts, head of the Google’s web spam fighting team, has gone on record by saying Google does not consider SEO to be spam. Matt said outright, “We don’t consider SEO to be spam,” and added that SEO is “a valid way to help people find what they’re looking for...  Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.        '>85.3% of the U.S. Internet Audience Viewed Online Videos in September 2011Search Engine Watch</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/Mashable/~3/sDGFZp9nmlY/http://mashable.com' title='   Netflix‘s price hike caused 805,000 paid subscribers to jump ship in the most-recent quarter, the company reported Monday. The company finished its third quarter with 23.79 million U.S. subscribers compared with the 24.59 million in had during its second quarter. In Q3, Netflix announced a 60% price increase, which went into effect in September. The company had predicted in a letter to shareholders that the impact of the price increase would be limited and the company would finish the Q3 with 25 million total subscribers. (The company lowered that estimate to 24 million in September, though.) Investors reacted by continuing to punish Netflix’s already-battered stock, sending it down 27% in after-hours trading. That, despite a relatively sound earnings report: Netflix reported $822 million in revenues for the quarter and earnings per share of $1.16, which beat estimates of $811.79 million and earnings per share of 96 cents, respectively. In a letter to shareholders, Netflix acknowledged that it handled communication around the price increase poorly:  “$7.99 for unlimited streaming and $7.99 for unlimited DVD are both very aggressive low prices, relative to competition and to the value of the services, and they are the right place for Netflix to be in the long term. What we misjudged was how quickly to move there. We compounded the problem with our lack of explanation about the rising cost of the expansion of streaming content, and steady DVD costs, so that … many perceived us as greedy. Finally, we announced and then retracted a separate brand for DVD. While this branding incident further dented our reputation, and caused a temporary cancellation surge, compared to our price change, its impact was relatively minor.” Image courtesy of Flickr, Ross Catrow              1. Netflix Stock Hits All-Time High                             July 13, 2011  Netflix stock more than doubled over the previous year, then increased by 15% in May to reach its last all-time high in July of $300. Click here to view this gallery. More About: earnings, netflix, QwiksterFor more Business coverage:Follow Mashable Business on TwitterBecome a Fan on FacebookSubscribe to the Business channelDownload our free apps for Android, Mac, iPhone and iPad            '>Netflix Loses 800,000 Customers in QuarterMashable!</a></li>
<li><a class='post' href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/LinkSpiel/~3/scT_piAvrIM/http://www.linkspiel.com' title='A new post from www.LinkSpiel.com  Recently, an SEO/friend asked me to help him with a back link analysis, he had been contacted by a very panicked former client who needed help. The two had worked together for a number of years before the client brought his SEO in-house so the SEO was familiar with the site and responsible (in part) for its ranking success.   About two years ago (my friend was gone by this time) the client decided to sell space on his site.  He had been solicited repeatedly by link brokers and finally gave in. He started with two text links in the footer and then added two more a couple months later.  The links were to sites in ancillary industries, they used creative keyword anchors and blended with the content. The client was being well paid for their placement so when nothing happened, he added four more for a total of eight text links in the footers.   Life was good, the client was ranking in the top five for most of his terms and he came through Panda unscathed. The fact he wasn’t hurt by Panda isn’t surprising, the site has been online since 2003 and is an e-commerce property with a very strong back link profile.   But change happens and earlier this summer the site took a nose dive. Scared, the client turned to his old SEO friend who in turn, called me for a second opinion. After carefully reviewing back links, his analytics, hosting information and a couple other things, we both agreed the footer links caused his fall.   Why?  For starters, he didn’t just fall a couple of spots, he was no where to be found. We’ll never know for sure but I suspect someone did a spam report after noticing the footer links and the site was pulled as a result. When that happens it’s usually because:    there’s been a change to the ranking algo, or pages linking to you went away, or your site had hosting issues and went offline, or you’ve been whacked by a reviewer/spam report/dmca notice    His inbound links didn’t change, he wasn’t offline, we heard nothing about an algo change or a DMCA complaint so it had to be reviewer/spam report.   Once we knew what didn’t happen, we came to the conclusion the eight footer links were causing the problem.  We convinced the client to remove the links, let us submit a reconsideration request and launch an awareness campaign to keep the traffic coming.  We then sent him off to increase his Adwords spend and got to work.  About 45 days later, after much groveling and the promise of a first-born child, the site popped (way) back in the serps.  Whoo hoo.   Here’s two interesting things about this little situation:   First, when the SEO told the client we thought the footer links caused the problems, he didn’t buy into it right away. Those footer links were on his site for several years and never caused any problems, he couldn’t believe eight little links were the cause of his downfall.   The SEO and I had nothing concrete to base our assumptions but since we ruled out everything else and know how much the engines dislike paid links, figured they were the problem.  Of course after the reconsideration request sparked dialogue with the search engine, he came around but initially it was a tough sell and that really surprised me.   Second, links in the footer area pointing to unrelated websites not only look out of place, they are easy for your competitors to spot.  Whenever I hear about footer links I’m reminded of this video Google Engineer Matt Cutts made:    …”we do reserve the right to treat links in footers a little bit differently. For example, if something is in a footer it might not carry the same editorial weight because someone might have set up a single link and it might be something that’s across the entire site whereas something that’s in an actual paragraph of text is a little more likely to be an editorial link. So we do reserve the right to treat those links differently in terms of how we consider them for relevance, how we consider them for reputation, how much we trust them, all those sorts of things.”   Personally I would never take chances with my bread and butter sites especially if they were ranking well.  The client site I talked about earlier?  His site never rebounded to the top five, it’s in the top 20 now which is a huge difference traffic and income wise. The change affected his bottom line and forced him to cut staff hours and design updates.   I’ve long associated reconsideration requests with jail and probation; you do the crime, you do the time and then you’re watched and monitored down the line.  Once a website/page is flagged and goes through the reconsideration process, it’s highly unlikely the page is just turned loose, I’m sure there is some algorithmic stigma attached which means you’re going to have to work harder and smarter for a very long time to get back on top and stay there. Having to do reconsideration requests is a huge time suck and causes needless stress, don’t make it easy for your competitors and the algos to be link finks, avoid buying or selling footer links.   Image from zazzle.com from: Link Spiel For more link building information, ideas and the occasional rant, visit LinkSpiel .  '>Link Finks And Getting WhackedLink Spiel</a></li>
</ul>
<br class='clear' />

<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/crap-i-failed-you/">Crap! I failed you.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/crap-i-failed-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video at Online Marketing Summit In Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/video-at-online-marketing-summit-in-chicago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/video-at-online-marketing-summit-in-chicago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPhFynD2_YY I&#8217;m at the OMS Chicago &#38; Integrated Mkt &#38; Tech Expo today. These events get bigger and bigger every year. And the topics are really interesting. If you get a chance, see if you can make one of these shows. It&#8217;s great content. Post from: SageRock Digital MarketingVideo at Online Marketing Summit In Chicago<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/video-at-online-marketing-summit-in-chicago/">Video at Online Marketing Summit In Chicago</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPhFynD2_YY" rel="nofollow" >www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPhFynD2_YY</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m at the <a href="http://www.onlinemarketingsummit.com/oms-chicago-and-integrated-mkt-and-tech-expo" rel="nofollow" >OMS Chicago &amp; Integrated Mkt &amp; Tech Expo</a> today. These events get bigger and bigger every year. And the topics are really interesting. If you get a chance, see if you can make one of these shows. It&#8217;s great content.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/video-at-online-marketing-summit-in-chicago/">Video at Online Marketing Summit In Chicago</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/video-at-online-marketing-summit-in-chicago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress 3.2 Features Are Spiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wordpress-3-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wordpress-3-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTibHpcf0Q8 I just updated my personal blog, SageLewis.com, with the new WordPress 3.2. The biggest noticeable difference is the full screen option while editing posts and pages. It gives you a completely clean environment in which to write. It&#8217;s something that I am definitely going to be experimenting with. There are also a variety of [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wordpress-3-2/">WordPress 3.2 Features Are Spiffy</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTibHpcf0Q8" rel="nofollow" >www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTibHpcf0Q8</a></p>
<p>I just updated my personal blog,<a href="http://SageLewis.com" rel="nofollow" > SageLewis.com</a>, with the new WordPress 3.2.</p>
<p>The biggest noticeable difference is the full screen option while editing posts and pages. It gives you a completely clean environment in which to write. It&#8217;s something that I am definitely going to be experimenting with.</p>
<p>There are also a variety of other less dramatic, yet important, feature rollouts.</p>
<p>The administrative user interface has been redesigned. There is an extended admin bar which gives you more links to control the site.</p>
<p>But the technical aspects which you don&#8217;t see on the front end are very important to be aware of.</p>
<p>WordPress 3.2 requires PHP 5.2.4 or greater and MySQL 5.0.15 or greater. So you are definitely going to want to make sure that your web host is up-to-date with those things. Upgrading to WordPress 3.2 could be fairly catastrophic I suspect if you are running PHP 4.</p>
<p>They also no longer support Internet Explorer 6. And they are starting the End-of-life (EOL) cycle for Internet Explorer 7.</p>
<p>It also has some page load enhancements. This should make your WordPress environment move a little bit faster.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s a lot of really good things they&#8217;ve done here. Just be sure that your web hosting environment can support these new updates.</p>
<p>Otherwise, go get WordPress 3.2. I think you&#8217;re going to love it!</p>
<p>You can see the complete list of features here:</p>
<p><a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_3.2" rel="nofollow" >http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_3.2</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wordpress-3-2/">WordPress 3.2 Features Are Spiffy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/wordpress-3-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networkers Have a Life</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/social-networkers-have-a-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/social-networkers-have-a-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rzc8Jzh-x4 A very interesting study just came out from the Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project and was reported on at search engine land. This report goes into great depth on the makeup of social network users. There are many really fascinating aspects of the report. Possibly the most interesting aspect for me is that [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/social-networkers-have-a-life/">Social Networkers Have a Life</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rzc8Jzh-x4" rel="nofollow" >www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rzc8Jzh-x4</a></p>
<p>A very interesting study just came out from the Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project and was reported on at search engine land.</p>
<p>This report goes into great depth on the makeup of social network users. There are many really fascinating aspects of the report.</p>
<p>Possibly the most interesting aspect for me is that the report clearly states that not only do social network users have a life but they actually oftentimes have more of a life than non-social network users. I find this very interesting because people often ask me, &#8220;Do these people have a life?&#8221; According to this report, they most certainly do. But check it out for yourself. I think you&#8217;ll find it very interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/a-portrait-of-who-uses-social-networks-in-the-u-s-and-how-social-media-affects-our-lives-81653" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">You can read more about the findings at Search Engine Land. </a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/social-networkers-have-a-life/">Social Networkers Have a Life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/social-networkers-have-a-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The SageRock System Is Now Open</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-sagerock-system-is-now-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-sagerock-system-is-now-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SageRock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure if you have been following my most recent project. But if you have, you probably know that I&#8217;ve been working on something called the SageRock System. The SageRock System is a complete Internet marketing program. It gives you all the tools I would ever recommend a company to have to build a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-sagerock-system-is-now-open/">The SageRock System Is Now Open</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you have been following my most recent project.</p>
<p>But if you have, you probably know that I&#8217;ve been working on something called the SageRock System.</p>
<p>The SageRock System is a complete Internet marketing program. It gives you all the tools I would ever recommend a company to have to build a complete online marketing program.</p>
<p>It comes from a conversation I had with a prospect. He said, &#8220;Sage, I want you to do all the things that you are best at and are difficult for me to do. Then I want you to show me how to do the things that I can easily do with some direction.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>That&#8217;s The SageRock System.</strong></p>
<p>It is a guided program with highly advanced tools that walks you step-by-step through creating a comprehensive Internet marketing program.</p>
<p>I attribute being able to create The SageRock System through doing nothing but Internet marketing since 1999.</p>
<p>Over a decade of experience has enabled me to create a comprehensive program.</p>
<p>I will guide you through making an Internet marketing plan and then I&#8217;ll walk you step by step through the tools and processes needed to make that plan.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s everything you need.</p>
<h2>I&#8217;m excited to say that it is now officially open.</h2>
<p>If you are interested you can go <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/services/the-sagerock-system" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank"><strong>HERE </strong></a>to learn more and register.</p>
<p>I have intentionally made it incredibly affordable. And there is zero obligation. It&#8217;s a month-to-month plan that you can stop at any time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m extremely proud of this creation. I believe in it with all my heart.</p>
<p>If you are interested, you&#8217;ll want to sign up soon. The program starts in February. So registration won&#8217;t be open long.</p>
<p>It will then be closed to new members.</p>
<p>You can learn more about everything it includes <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/services/the-sagerock-system" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank"><strong>HERE</strong></a>.</p>
<p>I hope you give it some consideration.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Sage</p>
<h2><strong><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/services/the-sagerock-system" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">GO HERE FOR THE SAGEROCK SYSTEM</a></strong></h2>
<p><a href="http://www.wordle.net" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">Picture by Wordle</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-sagerock-system-is-now-open/">The SageRock System Is Now Open</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/the-sagerock-system-is-now-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Places Search – Why EVERY small business should pay attention to Google Local</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-places-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-places-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Habermann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google places]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday I went to lunch with Sage Lewis at his favorite restaurant in Akron, Rancheros Taqueria. Although I feel their food is very good and more &#8216;authentic&#8217; than most Tex-Mex we get here in Northeast Ohio, they are not my favorite due to their lack of a Margarita/liquor license which I sorely wish they [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-places-search/">Google Places Search – Why EVERY small business should pay attention to Google Local</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday I went to lunch with <a href="http://www.sagelewis.com" rel="nofollow" title="Sage Lewis" >Sage Lewis</a> at his favorite restaurant in Akron, <a href="http://foursquare.com/venue/7573238" rel="nofollow" >Rancheros Taqueria</a>. Although I feel their food is very good and more &#8216;authentic&#8217; than most Tex-Mex we get here in Northeast Ohio, they are not my favorite due to their lack of a Margarita/liquor license which I sorely wish they would get.</p>
<p>As we sat down, Sage whips out his phone and proceeds to check-in at FourSquare for he is the &#8220;mayor&#8221; of this fine Mexican restaurant. Our conversation turns to 4sq and our likes and dislikes with what they offer and where they&#8217;ve gone in the past couple of years. We both have our +&#8217;s and -&#8217;s but one thing is clear: Local is BIG. Unbeknownst to the people running this establishment it has a very direct correlation to us being here this very day.</p>
<p>Google knows this. It&#8217;s why I believe Marissa Mayer got moved there. It&#8217;s why Google Places has just released the <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/10/27/google-place-search/" rel="nofollow" >search functionality for 50 million places</a> and why <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-gives-smbs-a-boost-with-automated-adwords-product-53783" rel="nofollow" title="Google Boost" >Google Boost</a> could be the next big thing with small businesses.</p>
<p><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/place-search-faster-easier-way-to-find.html" rel="nofollow" title="Place Search on Google Blog" >According to Google</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Today we&#8217;re introducing Places Search, a new kind of local search result that organizes the world&#8217;s information around places. We&#8217;ve clustered search results around specific locations so you can more easily make comparisons and decide where to go. Say you&#8217;re looking for that great BBQ restaurant with live music. With Place Search here&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll get:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZYqYi4xigk/TMhkEXrLo6I/AAAAAAAAG_I/AofjGzqD_t8/s1600/bbq.png" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" title="Google Places Search" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZYqYi4xigk/TMhkEXrLo6I/AAAAAAAAG_I/AofjGzqD_t8/s1600/bbq.png" alt="Google Place Search" width="592" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>The essence of this most recent change is that it changes they way it groups and organizes local listings. The importance of getting your local business fully listed in Google Pages does not change at all.</p>
<p>So, <strong>What is Google Places</strong>? The purpose of the new Google Places  is to cram as much potentially relevant information into the same amount of space as possible to let you, the user, sort it out for them.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In our new layout you&#8217;ll find many more relevant links on a single results page&#8211;often 30 or 40. Instead of doing eight or 10 searches, often you&#8217;ll get to the sites you&#8217;re looking for with just one search. In our testing Place Search saves people an average of two seconds on searches for local information.</p>
<p>2 seconds! Can you believe it?? What will you do with all that spare time? Pay attention small businesses everywhere.. Google Places is where you need to be. Right now. I don&#8217;t have many seconds to spare with this tip.</p>
<p>Other than the extensive time saving features you&#8217;ll love, Google has given us a link to preview how the new Places Search works. You can kick it&#8217;s tires and <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=chicago+museums&amp;esrch=LocalMergeImpl::Experiment" rel="nofollow" >test it out here.</a> All my joking aside, this is a major change in how local is going to shape the future of search. You can compare those SERP&#8217;s to the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=chicago+museums" rel="nofollow" >current version</a> to see how things are going to be changing monumentally.</p>
<p>Note how how local results are much more prominent, pushing more generic content below the fold while showcasing the Place pages and aggregate data collected from places like Yelp and Citysearch. Also important to note is the map that is on the right hand side that sits above the Adwords Ads 4th position. When you scroll down the page, the map stays in a fixed position on your screen and completely blocks the PPC ads all down the right hand side! Advertisers need to definitely pay attention to this. Things do seem to go back to normal on page 2 of the results but with all this new information overload on page 1, how many people will make it to the 2nd page at all?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it looks above the fold:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places1-8957.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open('http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places1-8957.html','popup','width=995,height=748,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" ><img style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0pt auto 20px;" src="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places1-thumb-460x345-8957.gif" alt="chicago-places1.gif" width="460" height="345" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the scrolling map covering the ads:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places2-8960.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open('http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places2-8960.html','popup','width=988,height=518,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" ><img style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0pt auto 20px;" src="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/assets_c/2010/10/chicago-places2-thumb-460x241-8960.gif" alt="chicago-places2.gif" width="460" height="241" /></a></p>
<p>Google keeps throwing curveballs. Is your small business ready to step up to the plate? Google Places would be a good place for you to start as it&#8217;s more important than ever.</p>
<p id="title_div3313537053">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/35529460@N08/3313537053" rel="nofollow" title="Taquerias Rancheros Akron" >Taqueria Rancheros &#8211; Akron</a> by NEOTacoTruck on Flickr</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-places-search/">Google Places Search – Why EVERY small business should pay attention to Google Local</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/google-places-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See The Taylor Institute in Action</title>
		<link>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/see-the-taylor-institute-in-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/see-the-taylor-institute-in-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sage Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sagerock.com/blog/?p=2415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got off a call about a really cool event coming up at The University of Akron&#8217;s Taylor Institute. The great thing about this event is that it is all hands-on. You are going to see all the really sweet stuff they have going on over there. You&#8217;ll check out the eye tracking lab [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/see-the-taylor-institute-in-action/">See The Taylor Institute in Action</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got off a call about a really cool event coming up at The University of Akron&#8217;s Taylor Institute.</p>
<p>The great thing about this event is that it is all hands-on. You are going to see all the really sweet stuff they have going on over there.</p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ll check out the eye tracking lab in use</li>
<li>Nero lab will be working</li>
<li>Call center will be open</li>
<li>Infomercial studio</li>
<li>There will be case studies to see what other businesses have gotten out of the Institute so far.</li>
</ul>
<p>The coolest part of all this is that the reason they are doing this event is to see how local businesses can use these resources.</p>
<p>The Taylor Institute is meant as not only a resource for the university but also for the business community.</p>
<p>This is an amazing facility for our business community.</p>
<p>You are definitely going to want to check it out so you can see how you can use it.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.webassociation.org/2010/11/18/marketing-technology-in-action-at-the-taylor-institute" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">You can register for the event here.</a></h2>
<p>But don&#8217;t wait too long. Registration is ending either Friday of this week or Monday the 15th. (Honestly, I missed the exact date on the call.) Just register soon!</p>
<p>I hope to see you there.</p>
<p>Sage</p>
<p>P.S.<br />
This is a Web Association event for Akron. Most of these events are in Cleveland. They are testing the idea of doing more events in Akron. So, we want to prove our Akron-Canton awesomeness.</p>
<p><strong>Please retweet this or share it on Facebook.</strong></p>
<p>We want to show them how great we are.</p>
<p>Sage</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog">SageRock Digital Marketing</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.sagerock.com/blog/see-the-taylor-institute-in-action/">See The Taylor Institute in Action</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sagerock.com/blog/see-the-taylor-institute-in-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

